And when talking about 256kbps or above, is the difference between normal and joint stereo noticable at all considering that there shouldn't be so many similarities in both channels (talking about elaborate music, not silly repetitive dance music and such) there were early bugs in joint-stereo. Unless there is a difference in bit-rate and bit-depth, there should be no visual or audible difference between FLAC and PCM audio (WAV is just a container, people). MP3 and AAC, however, are lossy codecs and would show a visual difference and a significantly audible difference than that of a lossless file that was not transcoded from a lossy source.
Said by:In dual-channel mode, both channels are recorded at the exact same bitrate (half of the overall bitrate for the document).In stereo setting, one route can have got a higher bitrate than the other. The encoder can 'determine' a increased bitrate would improve the quality in one sales channel and a Iower bitrate would be enough for the other route at any given time.Thanks a lot, guys. I learn something fresh every time!I believed maybe it was the mysterious Dual Móno, which we aIl know is much better than normal stereo. Said by:Thanks, guys. I find out something new every day time!I thought perhaps it was the mystical Dual Móno, which we aIl understand is much better than regular stereo.Oh boy.laughters. That Dual Mono will become around for awhiIe methinks. I wish Octo-Mono though, Take it up a few steps.By the way, I also am sending my thanks a lot to the details.
I knew a bit about the Articulation Stereo system (Strength and Mid-Side), but generally considered what the major difference between Dual Approach and Stereo system was. Therefore encoding something in Double route at 256kbps would end result in precisely dual 128kbps.
Same.Now, to get really fussy and stuff.If you consider two mono audio files documented at various periods (i actually.e., not two microphones capturing the same sound resource concurrently) and pan one left and one ideal, the result is usually stereo. Point is definitely, it's a stereo mix of two mono sound sources.If you catch the audio of a audio source with two microphones simultaneously, whatever signal is selected up by the still left mic will be really mono. Exact same with the correct mic. When performed back simultaneously (and panned tough D/R), what you hear is correct stereo.Lastly.Allow's state you possess a truly mono sound source playing out of Reasoning.
State, a mono hand clap, panned right up the center. Now bounce it as a stereo file. The result can be a 'double mono' document where the details in the still left and right audio documents is identical. There's i9000 no true stage in making double mono data files unless the audio is really panned off-cénter. In that situation, the sound will end up being identical in both data files, but one will be louder than the some other.HTH,Skiing. If you're speaking about Joints Stereo system in context with the development of MP3 files, after that the definition changes a bit.
There are usually a few different methods in make use of for producing joint stereo MP3 data files, but the fundamental idea is to consider everything that can be identical to both the still left and correct channels and encode thát as one chunk, then consider the difference, (what's i9000 remaining over) and éncode that to anothér piece.Theoretically, this provides you much better quality for a provided bit rate, but that doesn't always work out. Some éncoders downmix all thé low frequencies to mono first before doing the joint encoding. I don't understand precisely how Logic's joint stereo encoder works, though. Under no circumstances utilized it.